A FORENSIC DILEMMA, A MURDER MYSTERY - a very interesting true story
Yes! it's a true story.
On March 23, 1994...... The medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus, and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head. Mr. Opus had jumped from the top of a ten story building
intending to commit suicide. He left a note to the effect
indicating his despondency.
As he fell past the 9th floor, his life was interrupted by a
shotgun blast passing through a window, which killed him instantly. Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had been installed just below the 8th floor level to protect some building workers
|
|
|
|
and that Ronald Opus would not have bee able to complete his suicide the way
|
|
|
|
he had planned.
' Ordinarily, ' Dr Mills continued, 'Someone who sets out to commit
suicide and ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be
|
|
|
|
what he intended, is still defined as committing suicide.' That Mr. Opus was
|
|
|
|
shot on the way to certain death, but probably would not have been successful
|
|
|
|
because of the safety net, caused the medical examiner to feel that he had a
|
|
|
|
"homicide" on his hands. The room on the 9th floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was occupied
|
|
|
|
by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously, and he was
|
|
|
|
threatening her with a shotgun! The man was so upset that when he pulled
|
|
|
|
the trigger, he completely missed his wife, and the pellets went through the
|
|
|
|
window, striking Mr Opus.
When one intends to kill subject 'A' but kills subject 'B' in the attempt, one is
|
|
|
|
guilty of the murder of subject 'B.' When confronted with the murder charge, the old man and his wife were
|
|
|
|
both adamant, and both said that they thought the shotgun was not loaded. The old man said it was a long standing habit to threaten his wife with the
|
|
|
|
unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her. Therefore the killing
|
|
|
|
of Mr. Opus appeared to be an accident; that is, assuming the gun had been
|
|
|
|
accidentally loaded.
The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple's
|
|
|
|
son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal accident. It also transpired that the old lady had cut off her son'sfinancial support and
|
|
|
|
the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father would
|
|
|
|
shoot his mother. Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the murder
|
|
|
|
even though he didn't actually pull the trigger. The case now becomes one
|
|
|
|
of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus.
Now comes the exquisite twist:
Further investigation revealed that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus.
|
|
|
|
He had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to
|
|
|
|
engineer his mother's murder. This led him to jump off the ten-story building
|
|
|
|
on March 23rd, only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing through the
|
|
|
|
9th story window.
The son, Ronald Opus, had actually murdered himself. So the medical
|
|
|
|
examiner closed the case as a suicide.
A true story from Associated Press
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments
Post a Comment